Please join us on IIDB (iidb.org)
This is the archived FRDB and IIDB forum from prior to about March 2014.
It is read only.
If you would like to respond or otherwise revive a post or topic, please join us on the active forum: IIDB.
[quote=""Oolon Colluphid""]Thanks Mike. While I do enjoy a good nutter, I can't be bothered with deaf, navel-gazing nutters. I'll give this one a miss [/quote]
He reminds me a bit of the not-terribly-missed Robert Byers...
[quote=""scombrid""]Good news that the zoo is pulling the promotion but I don't like the zoo spokesperson's statements. They seem conveniently naive. [q]âItâs not about us endorsing them or them endorsing us,â said Chad Yelton, a zoo spokesman. âThat wasnât the intentio...
Any assertion that a given formation could have been formed by Noah's Flood should be accompanied by a clear discussion of why our conventional understanding of the formation is incorrect, as well as a clear discussion of why the Flood "model" (and I can't put enough quotes around the word...
Folks - Please do not turn this into a thread about any specific user's behavior here or at other boards - such behavior is self-evident. The intent of the OP was ostensibly to discuss the relative merits of Austin's notions. There do not seem to be (m)any. The thread has fallen into a very predict...
[quote=""Dave Hawkins""][quote=""Mike PSS""]Answer post #41 Dave. Stop slinging off-topic stuff around and keep to the subject at hand. Weathered layers and why Austin doesn't address or mention them in his model. ...tap...tap...tap...tap...tap...tap...tap...t...
Dave - Please respond substantively to the paper linked below. Geology and Stratigraphy of the Challis Volcanic Group and Related Rocks, Little Wood River Area, South-Central Idaho Not with hand-waving. Not with blithe dismissals. But with some commentary that indicates you've actually read the pape...