-
- Information on this archive. See IIDB.org
-
-
Please join us on IIDB (iidb.org)
This is the archived FRDB and IIDB forum from prior to about March 2014. It is read only. If you would like to respond or otherwise revive a post or topic, please join us on the active forum: IIDB.
-
Search found 929 matches
- Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:20 am
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: On the morality/immorality of the military
- Replies: 67
- Views: 957
If you wish to continue this discussion, I'll return as I have time. If not, it's been a pleasure, as always. Thanks diana, it's been my pleasure too. I'm not sure I have a lot else to add to the topic of whether military service is morally defensible. I think it is, for what it's worth, despite th...
- Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:03 pm
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: On the morality/immorality of the military
- Replies: 67
- Views: 957
I don't know what to say, Tom. That's quite a compliment. Thank you. (And frankly, I'm quite surprised this subject hasn't been discussed in this light before on this board.) I'm glad you found it complimentary but it was really just a statement of fact. I wanted to be clear that I was having this ...
- Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:58 pm
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: On the morality/immorality of the military
- Replies: 67
- Views: 957
I want to preface this by thanking you for having this discussion, diana. For reasons you can probably puzzle out I've wanted to have a thread about this for a long time, and given past events and the fact that I believe you to be trustworthy, sincere and thoughtful, there isn't anyone I'd rather di...
- Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:22 pm
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: Moral Beliefs v. Actions
- Replies: 57
- Views: 627
The act of rationalizing, even if it's a poor attempt, is the act of justifying the morality or amorality of the action. Another way of saying this is that at the time I commit any act, the fact that I have justified the act to myself means I have convinced myself, at least for the time being, that...
- Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:27 pm
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: On the morality/immorality of the military
- Replies: 67
- Views: 957
I believe you are a man who understands the need for a national defense, though, Tom. If not, please forgive my presumption. I do, I just thought it was important to clarify that it's theoretically possible to simultaneously recognize the need for a military and believe that participation in today'...
- Sat Dec 31, 2005 6:21 am
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: On the morality/immorality of the military
- Replies: 67
- Views: 957
Hi diana, just a few points I wanted to address. [...]I assume you understand that we require a military. If being in the military is essentially immoral, then who should it be comprised of? I'm not sure if you're anticipating the opposition's argument as charitably as you could here. What if I were...
- Fri Dec 30, 2005 5:43 pm
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: Moral Beliefs v. Actions
- Replies: 57
- Views: 627
- Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:52 am
- Forum: Moral Foundations & Principles
- Topic: Moral Beliefs v. Actions
- Replies: 57
- Views: 627
A = I believe X is wrong. B = I will not do X. You can take these two premises, and you can make a conditional. Is it sound? <snip> Why does A imply B? Because you say so? What argument do you have for it? I'm making the argument the best I can. Can you argue against it? I'm quite interested in sol...
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:45 pm
- Forum: Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
- Topic: Would you rather have a Theist or an Atheist hold your wallet?
- Replies: 116
- Views: 2009
- Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:02 pm
- Forum: Evolution/Creation
- Topic: "Creationist-Blood-In-The-Water Syndrome"
- Replies: 51
- Views: 1399
Did you read the OP?Nice Squirrel wrote:Flame warriors describes you as howlers:
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warrio ... owlers.htm