Yes, well said. Thanks for clarifying.<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Bobby_G:
Thunder,
Perhaps what you meant was that a vacuum still requires space-time- and therfore would require matter to exist, given that space-time is a consequence of matter's existence; hence of the gravitation of matter. It was just a little confusing to say "vacuum requires matter to exist in." </font>
-
- Information on this archive. See IIDB.org
-
-
Please join us on IIDB (iidb.org)
This is the archived FRDB and IIDB forum from prior to about March 2014. It is read only. If you would like to respond or otherwise revive a post or topic, please join us on the active forum: IIDB.
-
Is the universe eternal?
Codemason>>I think the best pre-big-bang model is that fluctuations of nothing (ie, true vacuum) created false vacuums (vacuum containing energy
Noble>>I must admit it's an interesting theory but how can anyone be sure that it can be a "true" vacuum? How can anyone know beside having faith in that aspect of science? Just imagine, I could patent this and make an everlasting light bulb!
Regards
Noble>>I must admit it's an interesting theory but how can anyone be sure that it can be a "true" vacuum? How can anyone know beside having faith in that aspect of science? Just imagine, I could patent this and make an everlasting light bulb!
Regards